Wikipedia:Pagipadasan: Paggiddiatan a nagbaetan dagiti rebision

Content deleted Content added
Saluyot (tungtungan | aramid)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Linia 2:
[[Category:Wikipedia|Sandbox]]
<!-- Ditoy, apo, ti nawaya a pagipadasan, pagexperimentuan, pagtestinganyo kadagiti aramidenyo a panid wenno suratenyo nga articulo wenno dagiti partuatenyo a templates. -->
{{Warning|This is a talk page for discussing the Wikipedia article [[Mozilla Firefox]], and is not a [[help desk]]. Please refrain from discussing matters not related to the article and its content. Any technical questions should be asked at [[ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing]].}}
 
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=FAC
|action1date= 07:34, 25 November 2004
|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mozilla Firefox
|action1result=promoted
|action1oldid=7840843
 
|action2=FAR
|action2date=23:39, 10 February 2007
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/Mozilla_Firefox/archive1
|action2result=kept
|action2oldid=107177921
 
|maindate=November 28 2004
padas padas padpadasli barbarengli
|currentstatus=FA
}}
{{v0.5|class=FA|category=Engtech}}
 
{{WP1.0
| class = GA
| importance = High
| orphan =
| VA =
| core =
| coresup =
| category =
| v0.7 =
| WPCD =
}}
{{WPFS|class=FA|importance=high}}
{{todo|1|small=yes}}
{{Archives|small=yes|auto=yes}}
 
== Resume support ==
 
If I were a Internet Exploter user searching for an alternative browser with reliable downloads I will like to see resume support reflected on the main Wikipedia page of every browser. Therefore, lack of resume support by Firefox should be reflected also here. This is one of his higgest drawbacks of every Windows browser. If you don't like the phrase reword it, but don't simply revert. {{unsigned|80.103.34.167}}
: As far as I can tell from the Firefox site, and from Firefox 2.0.0.4 on Mac OS X, pausing and resuming downloads works fine. You need to provide a source the download issue, and you need to write your additions in a well-written, encyclopedic manner. [[User:Perardi|Perardi]] 06:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:::Reworded the phrase, added info and included sources. I hope you are more happy. And please, don't revert as vandalism what it isn't, but essential info (at least for me as a Windows user). {{unsigned|80.103.34.167}}
::::I have re-removed it now, as the sources are unreliable and drawing conclusions from them would be [[WP:SYN|synthesis]]. Please either find a reliable source covering this issue or stop posting it. Note that if you revert again you will have broken [[WP:3RR|the 3 revert rule]], and are likely to be blocked.-[[User:Localzuk|Localzuk]]<sup>[[User talk:Localzuk|(talk)]]</sup> 15:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:::::Well, you have made *the* point. Synthesis of published sources is original research and against one of Wikipedia policies. Since I have got my ration of tantrum for this entire month, I will not do more research to test the state of the art of Internet technology; the capability of Wikipedia to ban a user with IP variable without having to ban the entire ISP range of IPs. And maybe without having to contact an ISP administrator at all. {{unsigned|80.103.34.163}}
 
==edit in features 18 july==
What is important are the features that people use, or, put another way, the features that made people stay with firefox as opposed to their previous browser. I don't know if survey data is important; for me personally, the tabs, increase text size withj cntrl+, bookmark all tabs to a folder and privacy settings were important.
Is there a way to gather survey data here in wikipedia - say a survey of all logged in posters ? [[User:Cinnamon colbert|Cinnamon colbert]] 14:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:That would be [[WP:OR|original research]]. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:O|action=edit&section=new}} →]O -</span> [[User:O|R]][[Special:Contributions/O|L]][[User talk:O|Y?]])</span> 19:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 
== Link to http://www.firefoxmyths.com ==
 
Hi. I am going to add link to http://www.firefoxmyths.com . Adding it is a service for our (Wikipedia) readers. I hope nobody will oppose this action, and I hope aggresive Firefox fanboys are not going to block me again because of it... [[User:209.250.234.50|209.250.234.50]] 14:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
:And it shall be removed on sight, because there was wide agreement that it should not be linked, failing [[WP:EL]]. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:O|action=edit&section=new}} →]O -</span> [[User:O|R]][[Special:Contributions/O|L]][[User talk:O|Y?]])</span> 15:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
::Don't people ever get tired of this? The site violates all sorts of ''External Links'' and ''Source'' criteria, nevermind that there's an established consensus not to include it here. Please, please, PLEASE find something more productive to do.--[[User:128.222.37.20|128.222.37.20]] 19:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
:::Exactly 128. Please respect our policies on external links and the consensus to keep it out of the article.-[[User:Localzuk|Localzuk]]<sup>[[User talk:Localzuk|(talk)]]</sup> 19:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
:::Could you be more specific why does this link violate [[WP:EL]], please? [[User:80.221.247.223|80.221.247.223]] 22:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
::::The spamming IP has since been blocked indefinitely because it is an open proxy. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:O|action=edit&section=new}} →]O -</span> [[User:O|R]][[Special:Contributions/O|L]][[User talk:O|Y?]])</span> 19:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
:::::It was not spam. BTW - Ryulong has indefinitely blocked not only that IP, but also <span class="plainlinks"> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Ryulong&page=User%3A209.250.224.0%2F20 whole /20 class -- i.e. 4096 IP addressess]</span>! (Feel free to read about CIDR notation [[Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing#CIDR_blocks|here]].) [[User:218.247.167.36|218.247.167.36]] 21:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)