|
[[Category:Wikipedia|Sandbox]]
<!-- Ditoy, apo, ti nawaya a pagipadasan, pagexperimentuan, pagtestinganyo kadagiti aramidenyo a panid wenno suratenyo nga articulo wenno dagiti partuatenyo a templates. -->
{{Pp-semi-sock}}
{{Warning|This is a talk page for discussing the Wikipedia article [[Mozilla Firefox]], and is not a [[help desk]]. Please refrain from discussing matters not related to the article and its content. Any technical questions should be asked at [[ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing]].}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=FAC
|action1date= 07:34, 25 November 2004
|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mozilla Firefox
|action1result=promoted
|action1oldid=7840843
|action2=FAR
|action2date=23:39, 10 February 2007
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/Mozilla_Firefox/archive1
|action2result=kept
|action2oldid=107177921
padas padas padpadasli barbarengli
|maindate=November 28 2004
|currentstatus=FA
}}
{{v0.5|class=FA|category=Engtech}}
{{WP1.0
| class = GA
| importance = High
| orphan =
| VA =
| core =
| coresup =
| category =
| v0.7 =
| WPCD =
}}
{{WPFS|class=FA|importance=high}}
{{todo|1|small=yes}}
{{Archives|small=yes|auto=yes}}
== Resume support ==
If I were a Internet Exploter user searching for an alternative browser with reliable downloads I will like to see resume support reflected on the main Wikipedia page of every browser. Therefore, lack of resume support by Firefox should be reflected also here. This is one of his higgest drawbacks of every Windows browser. If you don't like the phrase reword it, but don't simply revert. {{unsigned|80.103.34.167}}
: As far as I can tell from the Firefox site, and from Firefox 2.0.0.4 on Mac OS X, pausing and resuming downloads works fine. You need to provide a source the download issue, and you need to write your additions in a well-written, encyclopedic manner. [[User:Perardi|Perardi]] 06:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:::Reworded the phrase, added info and included sources. I hope you are more happy. And please, don't revert as vandalism what it isn't, but essential info (at least for me as a Windows user). {{unsigned|80.103.34.167}}
::::I have re-removed it now, as the sources are unreliable and drawing conclusions from them would be [[WP:SYN|synthesis]]. Please either find a reliable source covering this issue or stop posting it. Note that if you revert again you will have broken [[WP:3RR|the 3 revert rule]], and are likely to be blocked.-[[User:Localzuk|Localzuk]]<sup>[[User talk:Localzuk|(talk)]]</sup> 15:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
:::::Well, you have made *the* point. Synthesis of published sources is original research and against one of Wikipedia policies. Since I have got my ration of tantrum for this entire month, I will not do more research to test the state of the art of Internet technology; the capability of Wikipedia to ban a user with IP variable without having to ban the entire ISP range of IPs. And maybe without having to contact an ISP administrator at all. {{unsigned|80.103.34.163}}
==edit in features 18 july==
What is important are the features that people use, or, put another way, the features that made people stay with firefox as opposed to their previous browser. I don't know if survey data is important; for me personally, the tabs, increase text size withj cntrl+, bookmark all tabs to a folder and privacy settings were important.
Is there a way to gather survey data here in wikipedia - say a survey of all logged in posters ? [[User:Cinnamon colbert|Cinnamon colbert]] 14:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:That would be [[WP:OR|original research]]. <span class="comment plainlinks">(<span class="autocomment">[{{fullurl:User talk:O|action=edit§ion=new}} →]O -</span> [[User:O|R]][[Special:Contributions/O|L]][[User talk:O|Y?]])</span> 19:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
| 